GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Consumer Defensive » Consumer Packaged Goods » The Real Good Food Company Inc (NAS:RGF) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

The Real Good Food Company (The Real Good Food Company) Piotroski F-Score : 2 (As of May. 12, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2021. Start your Free Trial

What is The Real Good Food Company Piotroski F-Score?

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

The Real Good Food Company has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for The Real Good Food Company's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

RGF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 2   Max: 2
Current: 2

During the past 4 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of The Real Good Food Company was 2. The lowest was 2. And the median was 2.


The Real Good Food Company Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for The Real Good Food Company's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

The Real Good Food Company Piotroski F-Score Chart

The Real Good Food Company Annual Data
Trend Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22
Piotroski F-Score
N/A N/A N/A 2.00

The Real Good Food Company Quarterly Data
Dec19 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only N/A 2.00 N/A 2.00 2.00

Competitive Comparison of The Real Good Food Company's Piotroski F-Score

For the Packaged Foods subindustry, The Real Good Food Company's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


The Real Good Food Company's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Consumer Packaged Goods Industry

For the Consumer Packaged Goods industry and Consumer Defensive sector, The Real Good Food Company's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where The Real Good Food Company's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Sep23) TTM:Last Year (Sep22) TTM:
Net Income was -2.88 + -3.693 + -4.173 + -4.436 = $-15.2 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -7.77 + -15.943 + -10.657 + -2.265 = $-36.6 Mil.
Revenue was 35.653 + 29.798 + 35.363 + 55.565 = $156.4 Mil.
Gross Profit was 4.883 + 4.988 + 4.812 + 11.588 = $26.3 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Sep22)
to the end of this year (Sep23) was
(123.459 + 131.439 + 131.092 + 138.859 + 151.712) / 5 = $135.3122 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Sep22) was $123.5 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $136.7 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $90.6 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $58.2 Mil.
Net Income was -12.806 + -2.294 + -2.661 + -3.148 = $-20.9 Mil.

Revenue was 25.608 + 37.576 + 30.809 + 37.55 = $131.5 Mil.
Gross Profit was 1.264 + 4.247 + 2.351 + 1.768 = $9.6 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Sep21)
to the end of last year (Sep22) was
(43.805 + 102.144 + 98.692 + 121.414 + 123.459) / 5 = $97.9028 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Sep21) was $43.8 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $92.7 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $61.0 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $25.5 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

The Real Good Food Company's current Net Income (TTM) was -15.2. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

The Real Good Food Company's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -36.6. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep22)
=-15.182/123.459
=-0.122972

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep21)
=-20.909/43.805
=-0.47731994

The Real Good Food Company's return on assets of this year was -0.122972. The Real Good Food Company's return on assets of last year was -0.47731994. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

The Real Good Food Company's current Net Income (TTM) was -15.2. The Real Good Food Company's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -36.6. ==> -36.6 <= -15.2 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Sep23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep22 to Sep23
=136.695/135.3122
=1.01021933

Gearing (Last Year: Sep22)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep21 to Sep22
=92.734/97.9028
=0.94720478

The Real Good Food Company's gearing of this year was 1.01021933. The Real Good Food Company's gearing of last year was 0.94720478. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Sep23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=90.614/58.241
=1.55584554

Current Ratio (Last Year: Sep22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=60.975/25.528
=2.38855374

The Real Good Food Company's current ratio of this year was 1.55584554. The Real Good Food Company's current ratio of last year was 2.38855374. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

The Real Good Food Company's number of shares in issue this year was 8.881. The Real Good Food Company's number of shares in issue last year was 6.181. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=26.271/156.379
=0.1679957

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=9.63/131.543
=0.073208

The Real Good Food Company's gross margin of this year was 0.1679957. The Real Good Food Company's gross margin of last year was 0.073208. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Sep22)
=156.379/123.459
=1.26664723

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Sep21)
=131.543/43.805
=3.00292204

The Real Good Food Company's asset turnover of this year was 1.26664723. The Real Good Food Company's asset turnover of last year was 3.00292204. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+1+0+0+0+0+1+0
=2

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

The Real Good Food Company has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The Real Good Food Company  (NAS:RGF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


The Real Good Food Company Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of The Real Good Food Company's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


The Real Good Food Company (The Real Good Food Company) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
3 Executive Campus, Suite 155, Cherry Hill, NJ, USA, 08002
The Real Good Food Company Inc is an innovative, high-growth, branded, health- and wellness-focused frozen food company. It develops, markets, and manufactures delicious and convenient comfort foods designed to be high in protein, low in sugar, and made from gluten- and grain-free ingredients that are intended to be sold in the health and wellness segment of the frozen food category. All of its revenue is derived from the United States.
Executives
Bryan T. Freeman director, 10 percent owner, officer: See Remarks 3 EXECUTIVE CAMPUS, SUITE 155, CHERRY HILL NJ 08002
David Kanen 10 percent owner 6429 NW 65TH WAY, PARKLAND FL 33067
Philotimo Focused Growth & Income Fund 10 percent owner, other: See Explanation of Responses 5850 CORAL RIDGE DRIVE, SUITE 309, CORAL SPRINGS FL 33076
Kanen Wealth Management Llc 10 percent owner, other: See Explanation of Responses 5850 CORAL RIDGE DRIVE, SUITE 309, CORAL SPRINGS FL 33076
Philotimo Fund, Lp 10 percent owner, other: See Explanation of Responses 5850 CORAL RIDGE DRIVE, SUITE 309, CORAL SPRINGS FL 33076
Mark Joseph Nelson director LOCAL BOUNTI CORPORATION, 220 W MAIN STREET, HAMILTON MT 59840
Gerard Garfield Law director, officer: See Remarks 3 EXECUTIVE CAMPUS, SUITE 155, CHERRY HILL NJ 08002
De Cardenas Gilbert B. director 3 EXECUTIVE CAMPUS, SUITE 155, CHERRY HILL NJ 08002
Akshay Jagdale officer: Chief Financial Officer 3 EXECUTIVE CAMPUS, SUITE 155, CHERRY HILL NJ 08002
Strand Equity Partners Iii, Llc 10 percent owner 1888 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 1440, LOS ANGELES CA 90067
Josh Schreider 10 percent owner 3 EXECUTIVE CAMPUS, SUITE 155, CHERRYL HILL NJ 08002
Awm Investment Company, Inc. 10 percent owner 527 MADISON AVENUE, SUITE 2600, NEW YORK NY 10022
Andrew J Stiffelman 10 percent owner, officer: See Remarks 3 EXECUTIVE CAMPUS, SUITE 155, CHERRY HILL NJ 08002
Deanna T Brady director 1 HORMEL STREET, AUSTIN MN 55912
Seth Rodsky 10 percent owner 1888 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 1440, LOS ANGELES CA 90067