GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Energy » Oil & Gas » Miller Energy Resources Inc (OTCPK:MILOQ.PFD) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Miller Energy Resources (Miller Energy Resources) Piotroski F-Score : 5 (As of May. 29, 2024)


View and export this data going back to . Start your Free Trial

What is Miller Energy Resources Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Miller Energy Resources has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Miller Energy Resources's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

MILOQ.PFD' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 4   Max: 6
Current: 5

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Miller Energy Resources was 6. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.


Miller Energy Resources Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Miller Energy Resources's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Miller Energy Resources Piotroski F-Score Chart

Miller Energy Resources Annual Data
Trend Apr05 Apr06 Apr07 Apr08 Apr09 Apr10 Apr11 Apr12 Apr13 Apr14
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 5.00 4.00 2.00 4.00

Miller Energy Resources Quarterly Data
Apr10 Jul10 Oct10 Jan11 Apr11 Jul11 Oct11 Jan12 Apr12 Jul12 Oct12 Jan13 Apr13 Jul13 Oct13 Jan14 Apr14 Jul14 Oct14 Jan15
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

Competitive Comparison of Miller Energy Resources's Piotroski F-Score

For the Oil & Gas E&P subindustry, Miller Energy Resources's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Miller Energy Resources's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Oil & Gas Industry

For the Oil & Gas industry and Energy sector, Miller Energy Resources's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Miller Energy Resources's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jan15) TTM:Last Year (Jan14) TTM:
Net Income was -13.549 + -11.854 + -167.908 + -152.261 = $-345.57 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 0.045 + 7.424 + 18.059 + 1.489 = $27.02 Mil.
Revenue was 22.126 + 25.379 + 24.176 + 20.271 = $91.95 Mil.
Gross Profit was 14.286 + 14.457 + 14.046 + 8.905 = $51.69 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jan14)
to the end of this year (Jan15) was
(671.098 + 766.822 + 773.996 + 528.819 + 392.559) / 5 = $626.6588 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jan14) was $671.10 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $196.25 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $119.98 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $109.14 Mil.
Net Income was -11.459 + -6.928 + -4.988 + -3.102 = $-26.48 Mil.

Revenue was 7.73 + 13.008 + 18.796 + 16.628 = $56.16 Mil.
Gross Profit was -4.11 + 6.459 + 12.329 + 10.551 = $25.23 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jan13)
to the end of last year (Jan14) was
(562.487 + 572.824 + 603.09 + 646.443 + 671.098) / 5 = $611.1884 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jan13) was $562.49 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $74.27 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $51.47 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $60.82 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Miller Energy Resources's current Net Income (TTM) was -345.57. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Miller Energy Resources's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 27.02. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jan14)
=-345.572/671.098
=-0.51493523

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jan13)
=-26.477/562.487
=-0.04707131

Miller Energy Resources's return on assets of this year was -0.51493523. Miller Energy Resources's return on assets of last year was -0.04707131. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Miller Energy Resources's current Net Income (TTM) was -345.57. Miller Energy Resources's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 27.02. ==> 27.02 > -345.57 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jan15)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jan14 to Jan15
=196.252/626.6588
=0.31317202

Gearing (Last Year: Jan14)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jan13 to Jan14
=74.268/611.1884
=0.12151409

Miller Energy Resources's gearing of this year was 0.31317202. Miller Energy Resources's gearing of last year was 0.12151409. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jan15)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=119.981/109.144
=1.09929085

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jan14)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=51.465/60.823
=0.84614373

Miller Energy Resources's current ratio of this year was 1.09929085. Miller Energy Resources's current ratio of last year was 0.84614373. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Miller Energy Resources's number of shares in issue this year was 0. Miller Energy Resources's number of shares in issue last year was 0. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=51.694/91.952
=0.56218462

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=25.229/56.162
=0.44921833

Miller Energy Resources's gross margin of this year was 0.56218462. Miller Energy Resources's gross margin of last year was 0.44921833. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jan14)
=91.952/671.098
=0.13701725

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jan13)
=56.162/562.487
=0.09984586

Miller Energy Resources's asset turnover of this year was 0.13701725. Miller Energy Resources's asset turnover of last year was 0.09984586. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+1+0+1+0+1+1+1+1
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Miller Energy Resources has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Miller Energy Resources  (OTCPK:MILOQ.PFD) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Miller Energy Resources Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Miller Energy Resources's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Miller Energy Resources (Miller Energy Resources) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Miller Energy Resources Inc was formed in Delaware in November 1985. In January 1997, it acquired Miller Petroleum, Inc., a privately-held company, in a reverse merger in which Miller Petroleum, Inc. In conjunction with this transaction, the Company changed its name to Miller Petroleum, Inc. and re-domesticated to the State of Tennessee. The Company is an exploration and production company that utilizes seismic data and other technologies for the geophysical exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas wells in the Cook Inlet Basin of southcentral Alaska and the Appalachian region of eastern Tennessee. The Company focuses its efforts on activities in the Cook Inlet and Susitna Basins of Alaska as well as the Appalachian region of East Tennessee. The Cook Inlet Basin contains large oil and gas deposits including multiple offshore fields. The Cook Inlet is a vast estuary stretching 180 miles from the Gulf of Alaska to Anchorage in southcentral Alaska. The Inlet separates the Kenai Peninsula in the east from the Alaska Peninsula in the west. The Cook Inlet Basin underlying this region contains large oil and gas deposits including several offshore fields. There are also numerous oil and gas pipelines located in and under the Cook Inlet. The Cook Inlet Basin has produced approximately 1.3 billion barrels of oil and 7.8 trillion cubic feet ('tcf') of natural gas. The Susitna Basin underlies the sprawling Susitna River valley to the north of Anchorage. The Susitna Basin lies directly north of the Cook Inlet Basin, separated by the Castle Mountain Fault, and has similar geology. Wells drilled within its acreage range from approximately 1,500 to 4,200 feet in depth with major targets in descending order being: the Mississippian age Monteagle Limestone and Fort Payne Limestone, and the Devonian age Chattanooga Shale, with the Fort Payne Limestone being the primary oil target. The existing markets for natural gas production in southcentral Alaska are the Tesoro Nikiski Refinery, utility companies, petrochemical manufacturing, the production of LNG for export to Asian markets, and the production of synthetic crude oil ('syncrude'). Presently, its sole market for crude oil produced from its Alaskan operations is the Tesoro Nikiski Refinery. Crude oil is shipped by pipeline and tanker vessel to the Tesoro Nikiski Refinery, operated by Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Company ('Tesoro'). It competes with a number of other companies doing business in Alaska, Tennessee and elsewhere, including large oil and gas companies and other operators. The Company's exploration and production business is subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations on the taxation of natural gas and oil, the development, production and marketing of natural gas and oil and environmental and safety matters.
Executives
Daniel Vogel director C/O APOLLO MANAGEMENT, L.P., 9 WEST 57TH, NEW YORK NY 10019
Apollo Management Holdings Gp, Llc 10 percent owner 9 W. 57TH STREET, 43RD FLOOR, NEW YORK NY 10019
Highbridge Principal Strategies - Specialty Loan Fund Iii, L.p. 10 percent owner 40 WEST 57TH STREET, 33RD FLOOR, NEW YORK NY 10019
Jeffrey Fitts director C/O MILLER ENERGY RESOURCES, INC., 9721 COGDILL ROAD, SUITE 302, KNOXVILLE TN 37932
Apollo Investment Management, L.p. 10 percent owner 2711 CENTERVILLE ROAD, SUITE 400, WILMINGTON DE 19808
Apollo Investment Corp 10 percent owner 9 W. 57TH STREET, NEW YORK NY 10019
Highbridge Specialty Loan Sector D Investment Fund, L.p. 10 percent owner C/O HIGHBRIDGE PRINCIPAL STRATEGIES, LLC, 40 WEST 57TH STREET, NEW YORK NY 10019
Don Dimitrievich director C/O MILLER ENERGY RESOURCES, INC., 9721 COGDILL ROAD, SUITE 302, KNOXVILLE TN 37932
Gerald Girardi director C/O APOLLO MANAGEMENT, L.P., 9 WEST 57TH STREET, NEW YORK NY 10019
Apollo Capital Management, L.p. 10 percent owner 9 WEST 57TH STREET, NEW YORK NY 10019
Apollo Capital Management Gp, Llc 10 percent owner 9 WEST 57TH STREET, NEW YORK NY 10019
Apollo Management Holdings, L.p. 10 percent owner 9 W. 57TH STREET, NEW YORK NY 10019
Leland E Tate officer: Interim COO 4600 POST OAK PLACE STE 200, HOUSTON TX 77027
Phillip G Elliott officer: SVP and CFO 9721 COGDILL ROAD, SUITE 302, KNOXVILLE TN 37932
Jeffrey R Mcinturff officer: CAO 9721 COGDILL ROAD, SUITE 302, KNOXVILLE TN 37932

Miller Energy Resources (Miller Energy Resources) Headlines

From GuruFocus