Yuma Energy Beneish M-Score Historical Data
The historical data trend for Yuma Energy's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
Yuma Energy Beneish M-Score Chart
|
Yuma Energy Annual Data
|
|
Trend |
Dec09 |
Dec10 |
Dec11 |
Dec12 |
Dec13 |
Dec14 |
Dec15 |
Dec16 |
Dec17 |
Dec18 |
| Beneish M-Score |
|
Get a 7-Day Free Trial
|
|
|
-2.64 |
-5.99 |
0.10 |
-3.07 |
-2.29 |
|
Yuma Energy Quarterly Data
|
|
Mar15 |
Jun15 |
Sep15 |
Dec15 |
Mar16 |
Jun16 |
Sep16 |
Dec16 |
Mar17 |
Jun17 |
Sep17 |
Dec17 |
Mar18 |
Jun18 |
Sep18 |
Dec18 |
Mar19 |
Jun19 |
Sep19 |
Jun20 |
| Beneish M-Score |
Get a 7-Day Free Trial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-2.29 |
-2.70 |
-6.35 |
-4.15 |
- |
Competitive Comparison of Yuma Energy's Beneish M-Score
For the Oil & Gas E&P subindustry, Yuma Energy's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Yuma Energy's Beneish M-Score Distribution in the Oil & Gas Industry
For the Oil & Gas industry and Energy sector, Yuma Energy's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Yuma Energy's Beneish M-Score falls into.
Yuma Energy Beneish M-Score Calculation
The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.
The M-Score Variables:
The M-score of Yuma Energy for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:
| M | = | -4.84 | + | 0.92 * DSRI | + | 0.528 * GMI | + | 0.404 * AQI | + | 0.892 * SGI | + | 0.115 * DEPI |
| = | -4.84 | + | 0.92 * 1.5659 | + | 0.528 * -0.9647 | + | 0.404 * 0.1088 | + | 0.892 * 0.5141 | + | 0.115 * 1.0993 |
| - | 0.172 * SGAI | + | 4.679 * TATA | - | 0.327 * LVGI |
| - | 0.172 * 1.4796 | + | 4.679 * -0.153459 | - | 0.327 * 0.4565 |
| = | -4.40 |
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index
Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.
A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.
| DSRI | = | (Receivables_t / Revenue_t) | / | (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) |
| = | (2.646 / 11.733) | / | (3.287 / 22.824) |
| = | 0.225518 | / | 0.144015 |
| | = | 1.5659 |
2. GMI = Gross Margin Index
Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.
Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.
| GMI | = | GrossMargin_t-1 | / | GrossMargin_t |
| = | (GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) | / | (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t) |
| = | (3.237 / 22.824) | / | (-1.725 / 11.733) |
| = | 0.141824 | / | -0.147021 |
| | = | -0.9647 |
3. AQI = Asset Quality Index
AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.
Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.
| AQI | = | (1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) | / | (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1) |
| = | (1 - (5.169 + 56.558) / 61.958) | / | (1 - (6.514 + 73.979) / 83.35) |
| = | 0.003728 | / | 0.034277 |
| | = | 0.1088 |
4. SGI = Sales Growth Index
Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.
Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.
| SGI | = | Sales_t | / | Sales_t-1 |
| = | Revenue_t | / | Revenue_t-1 |
| = | 11.733 | / | 22.824 |
| | = | 0.5141 |
5. DEPI = Depreciation Index
Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.
DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.
| DEPI | = | (Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) | / | (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t)) |
| = | (8.891 / (8.891 + 73.979)) | / | (6.117 / (6.117 + 56.558)) |
| = | 0.107289 | / | 0.097599 |
| | = | 1.0993 |
Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.
6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index
The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.
SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.
| SGAI | = | (SGA_t / Sales_t) | / | (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1) |
| = | (5.811 / 11.733) | / | (7.64 / 22.824) |
| = | 0.49527 | / | 0.334735 |
| | = | 1.4796 |
7. LVGI = Leverage Index
The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.
An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage
| LVGI | = | ((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) | / | ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1) |
| = | ((4.269 + 11.879) / 61.958) | / | ((0 + 47.587) / 83.35) |
| = | 0.260628 | / | 0.57093 |
| | = | 0.4565 |
8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets
Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.
| TATA | = | (IncomefromContinuingOperations_t | - | CashFlowsfromOperations_t) | / | TotalAssets_t |
| = | (NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t | - | CashFlowsfromOperations_t) | / | TotalAssets_t |
| = | (-24.054 - -14.133 | - | -0.413) | / | 61.958 |
| | = | -0.153459 |
An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.
Yuma Energy has a M-score of -4.40 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
Portfolio Contest
YUMA_PA.PFD has been successfully added to your