UT Group Co Beneish M-Score Historical Data
The historical data trend for UT Group Co's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
UT Group Co Beneish M-Score Chart
|
UT Group Co Annual Data
|
|
Trend |
Mar14 |
Mar15 |
Mar16 |
Mar17 |
Mar18 |
Mar19 |
Mar20 |
Mar21 |
Mar22 |
Mar23 |
| Beneish M-Score |
|
Get a 7-Day Free Trial
|
|
|
-2.73 |
-2.43 |
-2.22 |
-1.97 |
-3.01 |
|
UT Group Co Quarterly Data
|
|
Mar19 |
Jun19 |
Sep19 |
Dec19 |
Mar20 |
Jun20 |
Sep20 |
Dec20 |
Mar21 |
Jun21 |
Sep21 |
Dec21 |
Mar22 |
Jun22 |
Sep22 |
Dec22 |
Mar23 |
Jun23 |
Sep23 |
Dec23 |
| Beneish M-Score |
Get a 7-Day Free Trial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
-3.01 |
- |
- |
- |
Competitive Comparison of UT Group Co's Beneish M-Score
For the Staffing & Employment Services subindustry, UT Group Co's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
UT Group Co's Beneish M-Score Distribution in the Business Services Industry
For the Business Services industry and Industrials sector, UT Group Co's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where UT Group Co's Beneish M-Score falls into.
UT Group Co Beneish M-Score Calculation
The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.
The M-Score Variables:
The M-score of UT Group Co for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:
| M | = | -4.84 | + | 0.92 * DSRI | + | 0.528 * GMI | + | 0.404 * AQI | + | 0.892 * SGI | + | 0.115 * DEPI |
| = | -4.84 | + | 0.92 * 0.9362 | + | 0.528 * 0.9131 | + | 0.404 * 1.0048 | + | 0.892 * 1.0884 | + | 0.115 * 0.9648 |
| - | 0.172 * SGAI | + | 4.679 * TATA | - | 0.327 * LVGI |
| - | 0.172 * 0.6699 | + | 4.679 * -0.128061 | - | 0.327 * 0.87 |
| = | -3.01 |
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
| This Year (Mar23) TTM: | Last Year (Mar22) TTM: |
Total Receivables was 円21,850 Mil.
Revenue was 円170,631 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円33,101 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円55,784 Mil.
Total Assets was 円71,630 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was 円1,309 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was 円1,237 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was 円1,623 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円27,903 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円12,417 Mil.
Net Income was 円3,831 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 円13,004 Mil.
|
Total Receivables was 円21,444 Mil.
Revenue was 円156,769 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円27,770 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円49,748 Mil.
Total Assets was 円64,107 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was 円1,411 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was 円1,245 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was 円2,226 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円25,467 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円16,012 Mil.
|
1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index
Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.
A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.
| DSRI | = | (Receivables_t / Revenue_t) | / | (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) |
| = | (21850 / 170631) | / | (21444 / 156769) |
| = | 0.128054 | / | 0.136787 |
| | = | 0.9362 |
2. GMI = Gross Margin Index
Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.
Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.
| GMI | = | GrossMargin_t-1 | / | GrossMargin_t |
| = | (GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) | / | (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t) |
| = | (27770 / 156769) | / | (33101 / 170631) |
| = | 0.17714 | / | 0.193992 |
| | = | 0.9131 |
3. AQI = Asset Quality Index
AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.
Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.
| AQI | = | (1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) | / | (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1) |
| = | (1 - (55784 + 1309) / 71630) | / | (1 - (49748 + 1411) / 64107) |
| = | 0.202946 | / | 0.201975 |
| | = | 1.0048 |
4. SGI = Sales Growth Index
Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.
Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.
| SGI | = | Sales_t | / | Sales_t-1 |
| = | Revenue_t | / | Revenue_t-1 |
| = | 170631 | / | 156769 |
| | = | 1.0884 |
5. DEPI = Depreciation Index
Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.
DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.
| DEPI | = | (Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) | / | (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t)) |
| = | (1245 / (1245 + 1411)) | / | (1237 / (1237 + 1309)) |
| = | 0.46875 | / | 0.48586 |
| | = | 0.9648 |
Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.
6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index
The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.
SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.
| SGAI | = | (SGA_t / Sales_t) | / | (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1) |
| = | (1623 / 170631) | / | (2226 / 156769) |
| = | 0.009512 | / | 0.014199 |
| | = | 0.6699 |
7. LVGI = Leverage Index
The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.
An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage
| LVGI | = | ((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) | / | ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1) |
| = | ((12417 + 27903) / 71630) | / | ((16012 + 25467) / 64107) |
| = | 0.562893 | / | 0.647028 |
| | = | 0.87 |
8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets
Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.
| TATA | = | (IncomefromContinuingOperations_t | - | CashFlowsfromOperations_t) | / | TotalAssets_t |
| = | (NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t | - | CashFlowsfromOperations_t) | / | TotalAssets_t |
| = | (3831 - 0 | - | 13004) | / | 71630 |
| | = | -0.128061 |
An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.
UT Group Co has a M-score of -3.01 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
Portfolio Contest
TSE:2146 has been successfully added to your