Tang Palace (China) Holdings Beneish M-Score Historical Data
The historical data trend for Tang Palace (China) Holdings's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
Tang Palace (China) Holdings Beneish M-Score Chart
|
Tang Palace (China) Holdings Annual Data
|
|
Trend |
Dec14 |
Dec15 |
Dec16 |
Dec17 |
Dec18 |
Dec19 |
Dec20 |
Dec21 |
Dec22 |
Dec23 |
| Beneish M-Score |
|
Get a 7-Day Free Trial
|
|
|
-3.28 |
-2.74 |
-3.26 |
-2.40 |
-3.03 |
|
Tang Palace (China) Holdings Semi-Annual Data
|
|
Jun14 |
Dec14 |
Jun15 |
Dec15 |
Jun16 |
Dec16 |
Jun17 |
Dec17 |
Jun18 |
Dec18 |
Jun19 |
Dec19 |
Jun20 |
Dec20 |
Jun21 |
Dec21 |
Jun22 |
Dec22 |
Jun23 |
Dec23 |
| Beneish M-Score |
Get a 7-Day Free Trial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-3.26 |
- |
-2.40 |
- |
-3.03 |
Competitive Comparison of Tang Palace (China) Holdings's Beneish M-Score
For the Restaurants subindustry, Tang Palace (China) Holdings's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Tang Palace (China) Holdings's Beneish M-Score Distribution in the Restaurants Industry
For the Restaurants industry and Consumer Cyclical sector, Tang Palace (China) Holdings's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Tang Palace (China) Holdings's Beneish M-Score falls into.
Tang Palace (China) Holdings Beneish M-Score Calculation
The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.
The M-Score Variables:
The M-score of Tang Palace (China) Holdings for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:
| M | = | -4.84 | + | 0.92 * DSRI | + | 0.528 * GMI | + | 0.404 * AQI | + | 0.892 * SGI | + | 0.115 * DEPI |
| = | -4.84 | + | 0.92 * 1.0942 | + | 0.528 * 0.58 | + | 0.404 * 1.0186 | + | 0.892 * 1.1676 | + | 0.115 * 1.4625 |
| - | 0.172 * SGAI | + | 4.679 * TATA | - | 0.327 * LVGI |
| - | 0.172 * 1 | + | 4.679 * -0.13172 | - | 0.327 * 1.0385 |
| = | -3.03 |
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
| This Year (Dec23) TTM: | Last Year (Dec22) TTM: |
Total Receivables was HK$16 Mil.
Revenue was HK$1,228 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$337 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$427 Mil.
Total Assets was HK$881 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was HK$312 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was HK$94 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was HK$0 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$425 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$188 Mil.
Net Income was HK$46 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was HK$162 Mil.
|
Total Receivables was HK$13 Mil.
Revenue was HK$1,052 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$168 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$465 Mil.
Total Assets was HK$841 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was HK$243 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was HK$125 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was HK$0 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$446 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$117 Mil.
|
1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index
Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.
A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.
| DSRI | = | (Receivables_t / Revenue_t) | / | (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) |
| = | (16.318 / 1228.216) | / | (12.772 / 1051.905) |
| = | 0.013286 | / | 0.012142 |
| | = | 1.0942 |
2. GMI = Gross Margin Index
Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.
Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.
| GMI | = | GrossMargin_t-1 | / | GrossMargin_t |
| = | (GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) | / | (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t) |
| = | (167.649 / 1051.905) | / | (337.472 / 1228.216) |
| = | 0.159377 | / | 0.274766 |
| | = | 0.58 |
3. AQI = Asset Quality Index
AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.
Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.
| AQI | = | (1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) | / | (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1) |
| = | (1 - (426.877 + 312.393) / 881.298) | / | (1 - (465.104 + 242.835) / 841.003) |
| = | 0.161158 | / | 0.158221 |
| | = | 1.0186 |
4. SGI = Sales Growth Index
Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.
Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.
| SGI | = | Sales_t | / | Sales_t-1 |
| = | Revenue_t | / | Revenue_t-1 |
| = | 1228.216 | / | 1051.905 |
| | = | 1.1676 |
5. DEPI = Depreciation Index
Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.
DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.
| DEPI | = | (Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) | / | (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t)) |
| = | (124.746 / (124.746 + 242.835)) | / | (94.397 / (94.397 + 312.393)) |
| = | 0.33937 | / | 0.232053 |
| | = | 1.4625 |
Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.
6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index
The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.
SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.
| SGAI | = | (SGA_t / Sales_t) | / | (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1) |
| = | (0 / 1228.216) | / | (0 / 1051.905) |
| = | 0 | / | 0 |
| | = | 1 |
7. LVGI = Leverage Index
The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.
An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage
| LVGI | = | ((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) | / | ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1) |
| = | ((187.736 + 424.556) / 881.298) | / | ((116.707 + 445.947) / 841.003) |
| = | 0.694762 | / | 0.669027 |
| | = | 1.0385 |
8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets
Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.
| TATA | = | (IncomefromContinuingOperations_t | - | CashFlowsfromOperations_t) | / | TotalAssets_t |
| = | (NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t | - | CashFlowsfromOperations_t) | / | TotalAssets_t |
| = | (45.602 - 0 | - | 161.687) | / | 881.298 |
| | = | -0.13172 |
An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.
Tang Palace (China) Holdings has a M-score of -3.03 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
Portfolio Contest
HKSE:01181 has been successfully added to your