Sula Vineyards Beneish M-Score Historical Data
The historical data trend for Sula Vineyards's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
Sula Vineyards Beneish M-Score Chart
|
Sula Vineyards Annual Data
|
|
Trend |
Mar20 |
Mar21 |
Mar22 |
Mar23 |
Mar24 |
| Beneish M-Score |
|
- |
- |
-2.55 |
-2.61 |
-2.20 |
|
Sula Vineyards Quarterly Data
|
|
Mar20 |
Mar21 |
Sep21 |
Dec21 |
Mar22 |
Jun22 |
Sep22 |
Dec22 |
Mar23 |
Jun23 |
Sep23 |
Dec23 |
Mar24 |
| Beneish M-Score |
Get a 7-Day Free Trial
|
|
|
|
|
|
-2.61 |
- |
- |
- |
-2.20 |
Competitive Comparison of Sula Vineyards's Beneish M-Score
For the Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries subindustry, Sula Vineyards's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Sula Vineyards's Beneish M-Score Distribution in the Beverages - Alcoholic Industry
For the Beverages - Alcoholic industry and Consumer Defensive sector, Sula Vineyards's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Sula Vineyards's Beneish M-Score falls into.
Sula Vineyards Beneish M-Score Calculation
The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.
The M-Score Variables:
The M-score of Sula Vineyards for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:
| M | = | -4.84 | + | 0.92 * DSRI | + | 0.528 * GMI | + | 0.404 * AQI | + | 0.892 * SGI | + | 0.115 * DEPI |
| = | -4.84 | + | 0.92 * 1.3423 | + | 0.528 * 0.9712 | + | 0.404 * 1.2546 | + | 0.892 * 1.0992 | + | 0.115 * 0.9137 |
| - | 0.172 * SGAI | + | 4.679 * TATA | - | 0.327 * LVGI |
| - | 0.172 * 1.1126 | + | 4.679 * -0.027164 | - | 0.327 * 1.1804 |
| = | -2.20 |
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
| This Year (Mar24) TTM: | Last Year (Mar23) TTM: |
Total Receivables was ₹1,714 Mil.
Revenue was ₹5,677 Mil.
Gross Profit was ₹4,339 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ₹5,023 Mil.
Total Assets was ₹10,264 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was ₹4,530 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was ₹316 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was ₹676 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ₹3,851 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ₹701 Mil.
Net Income was ₹933 Mil.
Gross Profit was ₹0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was ₹1,212 Mil.
|
Total Receivables was ₹1,161 Mil.
Revenue was ₹5,165 Mil.
Gross Profit was ₹3,834 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ₹4,245 Mil.
Total Assets was ₹8,814 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was ₹4,083 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was ₹259 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was ₹553 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ₹2,711 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ₹601 Mil.
|
1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index
Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.
A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.
| DSRI | = | (Receivables_t / Revenue_t) | / | (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) |
| = | (1713.5 / 5677.3) | / | (1161.37 / 5165) |
| = | 0.301816 | / | 0.224854 |
| | = | 1.3423 |
2. GMI = Gross Margin Index
Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.
Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.
| GMI | = | GrossMargin_t-1 | / | GrossMargin_t |
| = | (GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) | / | (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t) |
| = | (3833.8 / 5165) | / | (4338.8 / 5677.3) |
| = | 0.742265 | / | 0.764237 |
| | = | 0.9712 |
3. AQI = Asset Quality Index
AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.
Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.
| AQI | = | (1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) | / | (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1) |
| = | (1 - (5022.7 + 4530.2) / 10263.5) | / | (1 - (4244.68 + 4082.63) / 8813.7) |
| = | 0.069236 | / | 0.055186 |
| | = | 1.2546 |
4. SGI = Sales Growth Index
Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.
Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.
| SGI | = | Sales_t | / | Sales_t-1 |
| = | Revenue_t | / | Revenue_t-1 |
| = | 5677.3 | / | 5165 |
| | = | 1.0992 |
5. DEPI = Depreciation Index
Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.
DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.
| DEPI | = | (Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) | / | (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t)) |
| = | (258.9 / (258.9 + 4082.63)) | / | (316.3 / (316.3 + 4530.2)) |
| = | 0.059633 | / | 0.065264 |
| | = | 0.9137 |
Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.
6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index
The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.
SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.
| SGAI | = | (SGA_t / Sales_t) | / | (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1) |
| = | (676.4 / 5677.3) | / | (553.1 / 5165) |
| = | 0.119141 | / | 0.107086 |
| | = | 1.1126 |
7. LVGI = Leverage Index
The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.
An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage
| LVGI | = | ((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) | / | ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1) |
| = | ((700.5 + 3851.4) / 10263.5) | / | ((600.7 + 2710.92) / 8813.7) |
| = | 0.443504 | / | 0.375736 |
| | = | 1.1804 |
8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets
Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.
| TATA | = | (IncomefromContinuingOperations_t | - | CashFlowsfromOperations_t) | / | TotalAssets_t |
| = | (NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t | - | CashFlowsfromOperations_t) | / | TotalAssets_t |
| = | (933.1 - 0 | - | 1211.9) | / | 10263.5 |
| | = | -0.027164 |
An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.
Sula Vineyards has a M-score of -2.20 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
Portfolio Contest
BOM:543711 has been successfully added to your