GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Waste Management » ATON-High Technology SA (WAR:ATO) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

ATON-High Technology (WAR:ATO) Piotroski F-Score : 3 (As of May. 23, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2010. Start your Free Trial

What is ATON-High Technology Piotroski F-Score?

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

ATON-High Technology has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for ATON-High Technology's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

WAR:ATO' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 4   Max: 6
Current: 3

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of ATON-High Technology was 6. The lowest was 3. And the median was 4.


ATON-High Technology Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for ATON-High Technology's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

ATON-High Technology Piotroski F-Score Chart

ATON-High Technology Annual Data
Trend Dec12 Dec13 Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 3.00 6.00 5.00 4.00

ATON-High Technology Quarterly Data
Jun18 Sep18 Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Mar23 Jun23
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00

Competitive Comparison of ATON-High Technology's Piotroski F-Score

For the Waste Management subindustry, ATON-High Technology's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


ATON-High Technology's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Waste Management Industry

For the Waste Management industry and Industrials sector, ATON-High Technology's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where ATON-High Technology's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun23) TTM:Last Year (Mar22) TTM:
Net Income was -0.087 + -0.087 + -0.071 + -0.07 = zł-0.32 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.013 + -0.206 + 0.029 + 0 = zł-0.19 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = zł0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = zł0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar22)
to the end of this year (Jun23) was
(0.111 + 0.112 + 0.114 + 0.11 + 0.108) / 5 = zł0.111 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar22) was zł0.11 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł0.79 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł0.01 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł15.52 Mil.
Net Income was -0.127 + -0.101 + -0.148 + -0.126 = zł-0.50 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = zł0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = zł0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar21)
to the end of last year (Mar22) was
(0.129 + 0.121 + 0.12 + 0.1 + 0.111) / 5 = zł0.1162 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar21) was zł0.13 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł0.01 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł16.09 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

ATON-High Technology's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.32. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

ATON-High Technology's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.19. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar22)
=-0.315/0.111
=-2.83783784

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar21)
=-0.502/0.129
=-3.89147287

ATON-High Technology's return on assets of this year was -2.83783784. ATON-High Technology's return on assets of last year was -3.89147287. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

ATON-High Technology's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.32. ATON-High Technology's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.19. ==> -0.19 > -0.32 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar22 to Jun23
=0.787/0.111
=7.09009009

Gearing (Last Year: Mar22)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar21 to Mar22
=0/0.1162
=0

ATON-High Technology's gearing of this year was 7.09009009. ATON-High Technology's gearing of last year was 0. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.008/15.52
=0.00051546

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.011/16.093
=0.00068353

ATON-High Technology's current ratio of this year was 0.00051546. ATON-High Technology's current ratio of last year was 0.00068353. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

ATON-High Technology's number of shares in issue this year was 19.702. ATON-High Technology's number of shares in issue last year was 19.702. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

ATON-High Technology's gross margin of this year was . ATON-High Technology's gross margin of last year was . ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar22)
=0/0.111
=0

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar21)
=0/0.129
=0

ATON-High Technology's asset turnover of this year was 0. ATON-High Technology's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+1+1+0+0+1+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

ATON-High Technology has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

ATON-High Technology  (WAR:ATO) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


ATON-High Technology Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of ATON-High Technology's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


ATON-High Technology (WAR:ATO) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Ulica Na Grobli 6, Wroclaw, POL
ATON-High Technology SA is engaged in the development of technologies for hazardous waste disposal and recovery of valuable materials. The company provides microwave thermal treatment solution for neutralization of asbestos waste.

ATON-High Technology (WAR:ATO) Headlines

From GuruFocus

Atmos Energy Corp Annual Shareholders Meeting Transcript

By GuruFocus Research 01-22-2024

Q4 2022 Atmos Energy Corp Earnings Call Transcript

By GuruFocus Research 01-22-2024

Atmos Energy Declares Regular Quarterly Dividend

By Business Wire 08-02-2023

Q3 2020 Atmos Energy Corp Earnings Call Transcript

By GuruFocus Research 01-22-2024

Decoding Atmos Energy Corp (ATO): A Strategic SWOT Insight

By GuruFocus Research 11-15-2023

Q4 2019 Atmos Energy Corp Earnings Call Transcript

By GuruFocus Research 01-22-2024

Q3 2023 Atmos Energy Corp Earnings Call Transcript

By GuruFocus Research 01-22-2024

Q2 2023 Atmos Energy Corp Earnings Call Transcript

By GuruFocus Research 01-22-2024

Q2 2020 Atmos Energy Corp Earnings Call Transcript

By GuruFocus Research 01-22-2024

Q4 2020 Atmos Energy Corp Earnings Call Transcript

By GuruFocus Research 01-22-2024