GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Aerospace & Defense » TransDigm Group Inc (FRA:T7D) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

TransDigm Group (FRA:T7D) Piotroski F-Score : 6 (As of May. 13, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2007. Start your Free Trial

What is TransDigm Group Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

TransDigm Group has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for TransDigm Group's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

FRA:T7D' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 6   Max: 9
Current: 6

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of TransDigm Group was 9. The lowest was 4. And the median was 6.


TransDigm Group Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for TransDigm Group's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

TransDigm Group Piotroski F-Score Chart

TransDigm Group Annual Data
Trend Sep14 Sep15 Sep16 Sep17 Sep18 Sep19 Sep20 Sep21 Sep22 Sep23
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 4.00 5.00 8.00 8.00

TransDigm Group Quarterly Data
Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 8.00 8.00 7.00 6.00

Competitive Comparison of TransDigm Group's Piotroski F-Score

For the Aerospace & Defense subindustry, TransDigm Group's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


TransDigm Group's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Aerospace & Defense Industry

For the Aerospace & Defense industry and Industrials sector, TransDigm Group's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where TransDigm Group's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar24) TTM:Last Year (Mar23) TTM:
Net Income was 323.973 + 388.855 + 350.294 + 370.76 = €1,434 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 374.738 + 432.894 + 0 + 0 = €808 Mil.
Revenue was 1609.712 + 1735.324 + 1640.513 + 1765.48 = €6,751 Mil.
Gross Profit was 949.767 + 1023.204 + 955.514 + 1059.84 = €3,988 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar23)
to the end of this year (Mar24) was
(18687.472 + 18049.265 + 18711.89 + 0 + 19850.84) / 5 = €18824.86675 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar23) was €18,687 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €19,625 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €7,619 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €2,056 Mil.
Net Income was 225.148 + 268.66 + 215.232 + 283.936 = €993 Mil.

Revenue was 1322.508 + 1525.1 + 1318.768 + 1486.928 = €5,653 Mil.
Gross Profit was 771.936 + 894.86 + 748.592 + 867.686 = €3,283 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar22)
to the end of last year (Mar23) was
(17107.628 + 17802.774 + 18288.07 + 17453.616 + 18687.472) / 5 = €17867.912 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar22) was €17,108 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €18,072 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €6,964 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €2,356 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

TransDigm Group's current Net Income (TTM) was 1,434. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

TransDigm Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 808. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar23)
=1433.882/18687.472
=0.07672959

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar22)
=992.976/17107.628
=0.05804288

TransDigm Group's return on assets of this year was 0.07672959. TransDigm Group's return on assets of last year was 0.05804288. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

TransDigm Group's current Net Income (TTM) was 1,434. TransDigm Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 808. ==> 808 <= 1,434 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar23 to Mar24
=19624.52/18824.86675
=1.04247856

Gearing (Last Year: Mar23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar22 to Mar23
=18071.966/17867.912
=1.01142014

TransDigm Group's gearing of this year was 1.04247856. TransDigm Group's gearing of last year was 1.01142014. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=7619.44/2056.2
=3.70559284

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=6963.904/2355.548
=2.95638382

TransDigm Group's current ratio of this year was 3.70559284. TransDigm Group's current ratio of last year was 2.95638382. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

TransDigm Group's number of shares in issue this year was 57.8. TransDigm Group's number of shares in issue last year was 57.1. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=3988.325/6751.029
=0.5907729

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=3283.074/5653.304
=0.58073544

TransDigm Group's gross margin of this year was 0.5907729. TransDigm Group's gross margin of last year was 0.58073544. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar23)
=6751.029/18687.472
=0.36125962

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar22)
=5653.304/17107.628
=0.33045516

TransDigm Group's asset turnover of this year was 0.36125962. TransDigm Group's asset turnover of last year was 0.33045516. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+0+0+1+0+1+1
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

TransDigm Group has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

TransDigm Group  (FRA:T7D) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


TransDigm Group Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of TransDigm Group's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


TransDigm Group (FRA:T7D) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
Address
1301 East 9th Street, Suite 3000, Cleveland, OH, USA, 44114
TransDigm manufactures and services a diverse set of components and parts for commercial and military aircraft. The firm organizes itself in three segments: a power and control segment, airframes, and a small nonaviation segment, which serves mostly off-road vehicles and mining equipment. It operates as an acquisitive holding company that focuses its portfolio on firms that make proprietary products with substantial aftermarket demand. TransDigm regularly employs financial leverage to amplify its operating results.

TransDigm Group (FRA:T7D) Headlines

No Headlines