GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Technology » Software » Uber Technologies Inc (NYSE:UBER) » Definitions » Beneish M-Score

Uber Technologies (Uber Technologies) Beneish M-Score : -2.60 (As of Apr. 27, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2019. Start your Free Trial

What is Uber Technologies Beneish M-Score?

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Good Sign:

Beneish M-Score -2.6 no higher than -1.78, which implies that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for Uber Technologies's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

UBER' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.96   Med: -2.6   Max: -2.02
Current: -2.6

During the past 8 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of Uber Technologies was -2.02. The lowest was -2.96. And the median was -2.60.


Uber Technologies Beneish M-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Uber Technologies's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Uber Technologies Beneish M-Score Chart

Uber Technologies Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial -2.96 -2.79 -2.02 -2.39 -2.60

Uber Technologies Quarterly Data
Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.39 -2.58 -2.64 -2.50 -2.60

Competitive Comparison of Uber Technologies's Beneish M-Score

For the Software - Application subindustry, Uber Technologies's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Uber Technologies's Beneish M-Score Distribution in the Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, Uber Technologies's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Uber Technologies's Beneish M-Score falls into.



Uber Technologies Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of Uber Technologies for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 1.0099+0.528 * 0.9639+0.404 * 1.034+0.892 * 1.1695+0.115 * 1.063
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 0.7625+4.679 * -0.07902-0.327 * 0.8579
=-2.60

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec23) TTM:Last Year (Dec22) TTM:
Total Receivables was $4,121 Mil.
Revenue was 9936 + 9292 + 9230 + 8823 = $37,281 Mil.
Gross Profit was 3879 + 3666 + 3715 + 3564 = $14,824 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $11,297 Mil.
Total Assets was $38,699 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $3,314 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $823 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $7,038 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $9,454 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $11,009 Mil.
Net Income was 1429 + 221 + 394 + -157 = $1,887 Mil.
Non Operating Income was 1171 + -182 + 166 + 205 = $1,360 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 823 + 966 + 1190 + 606 = $3,585 Mil.
Total Receivables was $3,489 Mil.
Revenue was 8607 + 8343 + 8073 + 6854 = $31,877 Mil.
Gross Profit was 3300 + 3170 + 2920 + 2828 = $12,218 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $9,249 Mil.
Total Assets was $32,109 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $3,531 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $947 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $7,892 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $8,853 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $10,938 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(4121 / 37281) / (3489 / 31877)
=0.110539 / 0.109452
=1.0099

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(12218 / 31877) / (14824 / 37281)
=0.383286 / 0.397629
=0.9639

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (11297 + 3314) / 38699) / (1 - (9249 + 3531) / 32109)
=0.622445 / 0.601981
=1.034

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=37281 / 31877
=1.1695

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(947 / (947 + 3531)) / (823 / (823 + 3314))
=0.211478 / 0.198936
=1.063

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(7038 / 37281) / (7892 / 31877)
=0.188782 / 0.247577
=0.7625

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((11009 + 9454) / 38699) / ((10938 + 8853) / 32109)
=0.528773 / 0.616369
=0.8579

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(1887 - 1360 - 3585) / 38699
=-0.07902

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Uber Technologies has a M-score of -2.60 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.


Uber Technologies Beneish M-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Uber Technologies's Beneish M-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Uber Technologies (Uber Technologies) Business Description

Address
1515 3rd Street, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94158
Uber Technologies is a technology provider that matches riders with drivers, hungry people with restaurants and food delivery service providers, and shippers with carriers. The firm's on-demand technology platform could eventually be used for additional products and services, such as autonomous vehicles, delivery via drones, and Uber Elevate, which, as the firm refers to it, provides "aerial ride-sharing." Uber Technologies is headquartered in San Francisco and operates in over 63 countries with over 131 million users that order rides or food at least once a month. Approximately 44% of its gross revenue comes from ridesharing and 34% from food delivery.
Executives
Jill Hazelbaker officer: See Remarks 1455 MARKET STREET 4TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
Dara Khosrowshahi director, officer: Chief Executive Officer C/O INTERACTIVE CORP, 152 WEST 57TH ST, NEW YORK NY 10019
Tony West officer: See Remarks 1455 MARKET STREET, 4TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
Nelson Chai officer: Chief Financial Officer C/O CIT GROUP, 1 CIT DRIVE, #3251-9, LIVINGSTON NJ 07039
Yasir Al-rumayyan director 3884 PRINCE TURKI IBN ABDUL AZIZ, AL-AWAL ROAD, RIYADH T0 11452
Alexander R Wynaendts director 388 GREENWICH STREET, NEW YORK NY 10013
Sb Cayman 2 Ltd. 10 percent owner C/O WALKERS CORPORATE LIMITED, CAYMAN CORPORATE CTR, 27 HOSPITAL ROAD, GEORGE TOWN E9 KY1-9008
Revathi Advaithi director EATON HOUSE, 30 PEMBROKE ROAD, DUBLIN 4 L2 -
Robert Eckert director MATTEL, INC., 333 CONTINENTAL BLVD, M1-1518, EL SEGUNDO CA 90245
Garrett Camp director, 10 percent owner 1455 MARKET STREET, 4TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
Amanda Ginsberg director MATCH GROUP, INC., 8750 N. CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, SUITE 1400, DALLAS TX 75231
Thuan Pham officer: Chief Technology Officer 1455 MARKET STREET 4TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO CA 94103
Kalanick Travis Cordell director, 10 percent owner P.O. BOX 10195, PALO ALTO CA 94303
Manik Gupta officer: Chief Product Officer 1999 SCOTT LN, LOS ALTOS CA 94024
Glen Ceremony officer: See Remarks 800 WEST EL CAMINO REAL, MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94040