GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Industrial Products » Pacific Green Technologies Inc (OTCPK:PGTK) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Pacific Green Technologies (Pacific Green Technologies) Piotroski F-Score : 7 (As of May. 03, 2024)


View and export this data going back to . Start your Free Trial

What is Pacific Green Technologies Piotroski F-Score?

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 7, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Pacific Green Technologies has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Pacific Green Technologies's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

PGTK' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 4   Max: 8
Current: 7

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Pacific Green Technologies was 8. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.


Pacific Green Technologies Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Pacific Green Technologies's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Pacific Green Technologies Piotroski F-Score Chart

Pacific Green Technologies Annual Data
Trend Mar14 Mar15 Mar16 Mar17 Mar18 Mar19 Mar20 Mar21 Mar22 Mar23
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 7.00 4.00 4.00 4.00

Pacific Green Technologies Quarterly Data
Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 7.00

Competitive Comparison of Pacific Green Technologies's Piotroski F-Score

For the Pollution & Treatment Controls subindustry, Pacific Green Technologies's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Pacific Green Technologies's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Industrial Products Industry

For the Industrial Products industry and Industrials sector, Pacific Green Technologies's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Pacific Green Technologies's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec23) TTM:Last Year (Dec22) TTM:
Net Income was -4.069 + 3.288 + -2.736 + 10.92 = $7.40 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 14.092 + -6.105 + -5.464 + 11.142 = $13.67 Mil.
Revenue was 0.78 + 1.189 + 1.165 + 85.962 = $89.10 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0.248 + -0.029 + -0.435 + 24.741 = $24.53 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec22)
to the end of this year (Dec23) was
(53.085 + 30.566 + 19.747 + 37.005 + 36.479) / 5 = $35.3764 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec22) was $53.09 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.64 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $25.81 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $18.54 Mil.
Net Income was -2.679 + -3.259 + -2.242 + -2.224 = $-10.40 Mil.

Revenue was 8.725 + 2.024 + 1.195 + 3.64 = $15.58 Mil.
Gross Profit was 8.356 + 0.795 + 0.141 + 0.622 = $9.91 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec21)
to the end of last year (Dec22) was
(43 + 38.665 + 32.031 + 37.619 + 53.085) / 5 = $40.88 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec21) was $43.00 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $10.55 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $6.65 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $25.04 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Pacific Green Technologies's current Net Income (TTM) was 7.40. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Pacific Green Technologies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 13.67. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec22)
=7.403/53.085
=0.13945559

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec21)
=-10.404/43
=-0.24195349

Pacific Green Technologies's return on assets of this year was 0.13945559. Pacific Green Technologies's return on assets of last year was -0.24195349. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Pacific Green Technologies's current Net Income (TTM) was 7.40. Pacific Green Technologies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 13.67. ==> 13.67 > 7.40 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec22 to Dec23
=0.638/35.3764
=0.01803462

Gearing (Last Year: Dec22)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec21 to Dec22
=10.548/40.88
=0.25802348

Pacific Green Technologies's gearing of this year was 0.01803462. Pacific Green Technologies's gearing of last year was 0.25802348. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=25.805/18.537
=1.3920807

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=6.648/25.041
=0.26548461

Pacific Green Technologies's current ratio of this year was 1.3920807. Pacific Green Technologies's current ratio of last year was 0.26548461. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Pacific Green Technologies's number of shares in issue this year was 52.464. Pacific Green Technologies's number of shares in issue last year was 47.339. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=24.525/89.096
=0.27526488

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=9.914/15.584
=0.6361653

Pacific Green Technologies's gross margin of this year was 0.27526488. Pacific Green Technologies's gross margin of last year was 0.6361653. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec22)
=89.096/53.085
=1.67836489

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec21)
=15.584/43
=0.3624186

Pacific Green Technologies's asset turnover of this year was 1.67836489. Pacific Green Technologies's asset turnover of last year was 0.3624186. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+1+1+0+0+1
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Pacific Green Technologies has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Pacific Green Technologies  (OTCPK:PGTK) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Pacific Green Technologies Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Pacific Green Technologies's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Pacific Green Technologies (Pacific Green Technologies) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
8 The Green, Suite 10212, Dover, DE, USA, 19901
Pacific Green Technologies Inc is engaged in developing emission control systems technology. The company design, manufactures, and implements flue gas emission control systems throughout the world. It offers a product such as ENVI-Marine for the marine industry, ENVI-Pure for the waste-to-energy and biomass industries, and ENVI-Clean is designed for coal-fired power electricity generation and industrial plants involved in steel generation. Geographically, it has a presence in North America, Asia, and Europe of which it derives a majority of its revenue from the Europe region.
Executives
Fresh Air Investments (canada) Ltd. 10 percent owner 409-221 W. ESPLANADE, NORTH VANCOUVER A1 V7M 3J3
Twynam Investments Proprietary Ltd 10 percent owner, other: Chief Financial Officer 226 LIVERPOOL STREET, DARLINGHURST, SYDNEY C3 2010
Richard Fraser-smith officer: Chief Financial Officer 7 NIGHTINGALE ROAD, HAMPTON, MIDDLESEX X0 TW12 3HU
Pacific Green Group Ltd 10 percent owner BISON COURT, ROAD TOWN, TORTOLA D8 0000
Alexander Shead director 10/50 BERRY STREET, NORTH SYDNEY NSW C3 0000
Chris Williams director 335A THORPE ROAD, PETERBOROUGH CAMBS X0 PE3 6LU
Andrew Jolly director SOPHIA HOUSE, 28 CATHEDRAL ROAD, CARDIFF X0 CF911 9LJ
Neil Carmichael director 5205 PROSPECT ROAD, SUITE 135 - 226, SAN JOSE CA 95129
Jordan Starkman director, officer: President/Secretary/Treasurer 5205 PROSPECT ROAD, SUITE 135 - 226, SAN JOSE CA 95129