GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Healthcare » Medical Devices & Instruments » NanoString Technologies Inc (OTCPK:NSTGQ) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

NanoString Technologies (NanoString Technologies) Piotroski F-Score : 2 (As of Apr. 29, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2013. Start your Free Trial

What is NanoString Technologies Piotroski F-Score?

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

NanoString Technologies has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for NanoString Technologies's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

NSTGQ' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 3   Max: 6
Current: 2

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of NanoString Technologies was 6. The lowest was 1. And the median was 3.


NanoString Technologies Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for NanoString Technologies's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

NanoString Technologies Piotroski F-Score Chart

NanoString Technologies Annual Data
Trend Dec13 Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 1.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 1.00

NanoString Technologies Quarterly Data
Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

Competitive Comparison of NanoString Technologies's Piotroski F-Score

For the Medical Instruments & Supplies subindustry, NanoString Technologies's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


NanoString Technologies's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Medical Devices & Instruments Industry

For the Medical Devices & Instruments industry and Healthcare sector, NanoString Technologies's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where NanoString Technologies's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Sep23) TTM:Last Year (Sep22) TTM:
Net Income was -44.114 + -41.238 + -43.668 + -37.411 = $-166.4 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -28.081 + -35.749 + -31.448 + -19.699 = $-115.0 Mil.
Revenue was 34.422 + 35.805 + 44.157 + 48.089 = $162.5 Mil.
Gross Profit was 13.3 + 12.934 + 14.4 + 17.403 = $58.0 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Sep22)
to the end of this year (Sep23) was
(383.6 + 353.412 + 320.415 + 288.99 + 274.713) / 5 = $324.226 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Sep22) was $383.6 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $242.1 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $211.8 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $77.5 Mil.
Net Income was -29.261 + -39.5 + -39.239 + -36.69 = $-144.7 Mil.

Revenue was 42.455 + 31.08 + 32.219 + 29.541 = $135.3 Mil.
Gross Profit was 22.409 + 16.302 + 16.367 + 15.818 = $70.9 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Sep21)
to the end of last year (Sep22) was
(493.384 + 479.481 + 444.72 + 413.379 + 383.6) / 5 = $442.9128 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Sep21) was $493.4 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $246.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $318.7 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $50.9 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

NanoString Technologies's current Net Income (TTM) was -166.4. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

NanoString Technologies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -115.0. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep22)
=-166.431/383.6
=-0.43386601

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep21)
=-144.69/493.384
=-0.29326042

NanoString Technologies's return on assets of this year was -0.43386601. NanoString Technologies's return on assets of last year was -0.29326042. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

NanoString Technologies's current Net Income (TTM) was -166.4. NanoString Technologies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -115.0. ==> -115.0 > -166.4 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Sep23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep22 to Sep23
=242.124/324.226
=0.7467754

Gearing (Last Year: Sep22)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep21 to Sep22
=245.976/442.9128
=0.55535988

NanoString Technologies's gearing of this year was 0.7467754. NanoString Technologies's gearing of last year was 0.55535988. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Sep23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=211.807/77.532
=2.73186555

Current Ratio (Last Year: Sep22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=318.708/50.939
=6.25665993

NanoString Technologies's current ratio of this year was 2.73186555. NanoString Technologies's current ratio of last year was 6.25665993. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

NanoString Technologies's number of shares in issue this year was 47.715. NanoString Technologies's number of shares in issue last year was 46.529. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=58.037/162.473
=0.35721012

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=70.896/135.295
=0.5240105

NanoString Technologies's gross margin of this year was 0.35721012. NanoString Technologies's gross margin of last year was 0.5240105. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Sep22)
=162.473/383.6
=0.42354797

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Sep21)
=135.295/493.384
=0.27421846

NanoString Technologies's asset turnover of this year was 0.42354797. NanoString Technologies's asset turnover of last year was 0.27421846. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+0+0+0+0+1
=2

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

NanoString Technologies has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

NanoString Technologies  (OTCPK:NSTGQ) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


NanoString Technologies Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of NanoString Technologies's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


NanoString Technologies (NanoString Technologies) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
Address
530 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA, USA, 98109
NanoString Technologies Inc is engaged in the development, manufacturing and commercialization of instruments, consumables, and services for efficiently profiling the activity of hundreds of genes and proteins simultaneously from a single tissue sample. Its core technology includes proprietary chemistries that enable the labeling and counting of single molecules. The firm uses its technology to develop tools for scientific and clinical research, primarily in the fields of genomics and proteomics. It offers two product platforms such as nCounter Analysis System or nCounter, and GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiler or DSP system both include instruments, related consumables, and software. NanoString Technologies generates revenue from the sale of products and related services and collaborations.
Executives
Jonathan Todd Garland officer: Chief Commercial Officer C/O CYTEK BIOSCIENCES, INC., 47215 LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD, FREMONT CA 94538
K Thomas Bailey officer: Chief Financial Officer 1618 STATION STREET, VANCOUVER A1 V6A 1B6
R Bradley Gray director, officer: President and CEO 530 FAIRVIEW AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 2000, SEATTLE WA 98109
William Young director 14 CAMBRIDGE CENTER, CAMBRIDGE MA 02142
Waite Charles P Jr director, 10 percent owner 11023 NE 116TH STREET, KIRKLAND WA 98034
Gregory Norden director 16640 CHESTERFIELD GROVE DRIVE, SUITE 200, CHESTERFIELD MO 63005
Elisha W Finney director C/O VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC, 3100 HANSEN WAY M/S E-327, PALO ALTO CA 94304
Teresa M. Foy director 530 FAIRVIEW AVENUE NORTH, SEATTLE WA 98109
Joseph M Beechem officer: SVP, Research & Development 530 FAIRVIEW AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 2000, SEATTLE WA 98109
John D. Gerace officer: Chief Commercial Officer C/O NANOSTRING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 530 FAIRVIEW AVENUE NORTH, SEATTLE WA 98109
Kirk Malloy director 5200 ILLUMINA WAY, SAN DIEGO CA 92122
J. Chad Brown officer: SVP, Sales & Marketing 530 FAIRVIEW AVENUE NORTH, SEATTLE WA 98109
Robert Hershberg director 3005 FIRST AVENUE, SEATTLE WA 98121
Janet George director 530 FAIRVIEW AVENUE NORTH, SEATTLE WA 98109
Dana E. Rollison director 530 FAIRVIEW AVENUE NORTH, SEATTLE WA 98109

NanoString Technologies (NanoString Technologies) Headlines