GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Construction » Miyaji Engineering Group Inc (TSE:3431) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Miyaji Engineering Group (TSE:3431) Piotroski F-Score : 7 (As of May. 20, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2003. Start your Free Trial

What is Miyaji Engineering Group Piotroski F-Score?

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 7, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Miyaji Engineering Group has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Miyaji Engineering Group's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TSE:3431' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6   Med: 6   Max: 7
Current: 7

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Miyaji Engineering Group was 7. The lowest was 6. And the median was 6.


Miyaji Engineering Group Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Miyaji Engineering Group's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Miyaji Engineering Group Piotroski F-Score Chart

Miyaji Engineering Group Annual Data
Trend Mar15 Mar16 Mar17 Mar18 Mar19 Mar20 Mar21 Mar22 Mar23 Mar24
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 7.00

Miyaji Engineering Group Quarterly Data
Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 - - - 7.00

Competitive Comparison of Miyaji Engineering Group's Piotroski F-Score

For the Engineering & Construction subindustry, Miyaji Engineering Group's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Miyaji Engineering Group's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Construction Industry

For the Construction industry and Industrials sector, Miyaji Engineering Group's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Miyaji Engineering Group's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar24) TTM:Last Year (Mar23) TTM:
Net Income was 円4,354 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 円8,841 Mil.
Revenue was 円69,365 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円12,832 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar23)
to the end of this year (Mar24) was (63051 + 74146) / 2 = 円68598.5 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar23) was 円63,051 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円326 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円51,316 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円22,851 Mil.
Net Income was 円3,077 Mil.

Revenue was 円60,279 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円9,053 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar22)
to the end of last year (Mar23) was (61815 + 63051) / 2 = 円62433 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar22) was 円61,815 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円81 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円43,185 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円17,395 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Miyaji Engineering Group's current Net Income (TTM) was 4,354. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Miyaji Engineering Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 8,841. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar23)
=4354/63051
=0.06905521

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar22)
=3077/61815
=0.04977756

Miyaji Engineering Group's return on assets of this year was 0.06905521. Miyaji Engineering Group's return on assets of last year was 0.04977756. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Miyaji Engineering Group's current Net Income (TTM) was 4,354. Miyaji Engineering Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 8,841. ==> 8,841 > 4,354 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar23 to Mar24
=326/68598.5
=0.00475229

Gearing (Last Year: Mar23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar22 to Mar23
=81/62433
=0.00129739

Miyaji Engineering Group's gearing of this year was 0.00475229. Miyaji Engineering Group's gearing of last year was 0.00129739. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=51316/22851
=2.24567853

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=43185/17395
=2.48260995

Miyaji Engineering Group's current ratio of this year was 2.24567853. Miyaji Engineering Group's current ratio of last year was 2.48260995. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Miyaji Engineering Group's number of shares in issue this year was 13.608. Miyaji Engineering Group's number of shares in issue last year was 13.61. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=12832/69365
=0.18499243

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=9053/60279
=0.15018497

Miyaji Engineering Group's gross margin of this year was 0.18499243. Miyaji Engineering Group's gross margin of last year was 0.15018497. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar23)
=69365/63051
=1.10014116

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar22)
=60279/61815
=0.97515166

Miyaji Engineering Group's asset turnover of this year was 1.10014116. Miyaji Engineering Group's asset turnover of last year was 0.97515166. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+0+0+1+1+1
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Miyaji Engineering Group has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Miyaji Engineering Group  (TSE:3431) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Miyaji Engineering Group Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Miyaji Engineering Group's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Miyaji Engineering Group (TSE:3431) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
7-5 Ohdenma-cho, 9-19, Tomizawa-cho, Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, JPN, 103-0006
Miyaji Engineering Group Inc is a Japan-based construction engineering company. Along with its subsidiaries, the firm is engaged in designing, production, installation, maintenance, and repair of bridges, steel frames, and other steel structures. The company also undertakes civil engineering work and floor planning.

Miyaji Engineering Group (TSE:3431) Headlines

No Headlines