GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Basic Materials » Chemicals » Great Tang Bid Technology Inc (OTCPK:GTBT) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Great Tang Bid Technology (Great Tang Bid Technology) Piotroski F-Score : 0 (As of May. 15, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2006. Start your Free Trial

What is Great Tang Bid Technology Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Great Tang Bid Technology has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Great Tang Bid Technology's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:


Great Tang Bid Technology Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Great Tang Bid Technology's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Great Tang Bid Technology Piotroski F-Score Chart

Great Tang Bid Technology Annual Data
Trend May07 May08 Dec09 Dec10 Dec11 Dec12 Dec13 Dec14 Dec20 Dec21
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 4.00 6.00 N/A N/A

Great Tang Bid Technology Quarterly Data
Mar13 Jun13 Sep13 Dec13 Mar14 Jun14 Sep14 Dec14 Mar15 Jun15 Sep15 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar22) TTM:Last Year (Mar21) TTM:
Net Income was 0 + -0.002 + 0 + -0.02 = $-0.02 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 0 + 0 + 0 + -0.02 = $-0.02 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar21)
to the end of this year (Mar22) was
(0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0) / 5 = $0 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar21) was $0.00 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.00 Mil.
Net Income was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar20)
to the end of last year (Mar21) was
(4.083 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0) / 5 = $4.083 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar20) was $4.08 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.01 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Great Tang Bid Technology's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.02. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Great Tang Bid Technology's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.02. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar21)
=-0.022/0
=

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar20)
=0/4.083
=0

Great Tang Bid Technology's return on assets of this year was . Great Tang Bid Technology's return on assets of last year was 0. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Great Tang Bid Technology's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.02. Great Tang Bid Technology's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.02. ==> -0.02 > -0.02 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (Last Year: Mar21)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar20 to Mar21
=0/4.083
=0

Great Tang Bid Technology's gearing of this year was . Great Tang Bid Technology's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0/0
=

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar21)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0/0.01
=0

Great Tang Bid Technology's current ratio of this year was . Great Tang Bid Technology's current ratio of last year was 0. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Great Tang Bid Technology's number of shares in issue this year was 0.238. Great Tang Bid Technology's number of shares in issue last year was 0.238. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Great Tang Bid Technology's gross margin of this year was . Great Tang Bid Technology's gross margin of last year was . ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar20)
=0/4.083
=0

Great Tang Bid Technology's asset turnover of this year was . Great Tang Bid Technology's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+1+0+1+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Great Tang Bid Technology has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Great Tang Bid Technology  (OTCPK:GTBT) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Great Tang Bid Technology Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Great Tang Bid Technology's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Great Tang Bid Technology (Great Tang Bid Technology) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
50 West Liberty Street, Suite 880, Reno, NV, USA, 89501
Great Tang Bid Technology Inc formerly ESP Resources Inc through its subsidiaries manufacture, blends, distributes and markets specialty chemicals and analytical services to the oil and gas industry. The company provides services for the upstream and downstream sectors of the energy industry, including new construction, onshore and offshore production, gathering, refining facilities and pipelines. Its products include analysis and formulation products, production chemicals and completion chemicals. The firm operates in the United States of America.
Executives
Robert H Geiges officer: Chief Financial Officer 9224 N LONGFEATHER, FOUNTAIN HILLS AZ 85268
David Dugas director, officer: Chief Executive Officer 1255 LIONS CLUB ROAD, SCOTT LA 70583
William M Cox director 111 LIONS CLUB STREET, SCOTT LA 70583
Tony Primeaux director, officer: Vice-President 111 LIONS CLUB STREET, SCOTT LA 70583
Christopher Sean Metcalf director, officer: President and CEO 815-A BRAZOS ST., #322, AUSTIN TX 78701
Celine Totman director, officer: Secretary Treasurer 3316 WEST 1ST AVENUE, VANCOUVER A1 V6R 1G4
Peter Hughes director, officer: President and CEO 3316 WEST 1ST AVENUE, VANCOUVER A1 V6R 1G4

Great Tang Bid Technology (Great Tang Bid Technology) Headlines